· Easy to report the dripping fast car merger involving violations and monopoly
According to media reports, the easy-to-use car announced on February 16 that it has officially submitted to the Anti-monopoly Bureau of the Ministry of Commerce of China (the Office of the State Council Anti-monopoly Committee), the National Development and Reform Commission, the Price Supervision and Inspection and Anti-Monopoly Bureau ("National Development and Reform Commission" Reporting the merger of Beijing Xiaoju Technology Co., Ltd. ("Drip") and Hangzhou Kuzhi Technology Co., Ltd. ("Fast") failed to report to the relevant departments as required, seriously violated China's "Monopoly Law", requested to investigate and The merger of the two companies is prohibited. Jiangsu Aoli New Materials Co.,Ltd , https://www.jsaolimaterials.com
On February 14, Didi, the official announcement of the merger. Once the news of the merger of the two companies was released, the news about their alleged monopoly was endless.
Easy to use the car that one of the mergers disclosed in its official website in March 2014 revealed that the company's driver account flow reached 4.73 billion yuan, monthly average revenue exceeded 10 million yuan, only this one is far Anti-monopoly reporting standards stipulated by super-related regulations. The two cases of mergers without declaration were seriously illegal. After the merger, the market share in the relevant market exceeds 90%. In fact, it constitutes an oligopoly in the online taxi industry, which will eliminate and eliminate market competition in related industries and seriously damage the interests of Chinese consumers. In accordance with relevant regulations, the merger of the two companies should have the right to investigate according to law and prohibit the merger of the two companies, even if they do not constitute the threshold for the turnover of the anti-monopoly declaration.
For the merger of Didi and the rapid merger, Shen Danyang, a spokesperson for the Ministry of Commerce, said that the Ministry of Commerce has noticed reports from the media, but the Ministry of Commerce has not received any business related to taxis and fast taxis. The report is concentrated. According to the anti-monopoly law and its relevant regulations, if the operator concentrates on meeting the reporting standards, the operator shall report to the Ministry of Commerce in advance, and the non-declared shall not be concentrated.
The response given by Didi is that since both companies have not reached the reporting threshold for the concentration of relevant operators, there is no need for centralized reporting by operators, but the two have already actively reported the communication with the relevant departments.
Â