Drying equipment when GEM is in progress
Should reflect encouraging innovation
Shandong Tianli Drying Equipment Co., Ltd. General Manager Chai Bingyin believes that serving high growth,
Innovative SMEs should be the essence of GEM. However, in the draft solicitation draft, the recognition and tilt of high-tech companies have been deleted. He feels lost.
Coincidentally, a person in charge of Weihai Fishery Science and Technology Development Co., Ltd., which has been hoping to get on the GEM board, also believes that the GEM should at least reflect some of the tilt factors for high-tech companies. He believes that emphasizing innovation and safeguarding shareholders' rights does not conflict. For example, when the science and technology department recognizes the Torch Program, its standards include not only the urgent need of the country, but also the high technological content, and it also requires a better prospect for the industrialization of its R&D products. He further added: The reason why we believe that a company's products are innovative products is because such products have not been before, and its prospects may not be recognized by most people. If you are aware of it, it is not an innovative product. The recognition of professional departments ensures the market prospects and the content of innovation, as well as the significance of social progress. Conversely, if it is a product that everyone can see clearly, then companies can use other channels to finance, rather than on the GEM.
Regulatory measures must grasp "degree"
For regulatory measures different from the main board as stipulated in the Exposure Draft, if the issuer discloses a profit forecast, if the realized profit amount does not reach 80% of the profit forecast, the China Securities Regulatory Commission may issue a warning to the legal representative, etc., in addition to force majeure. Terms, different companies also have different views. Most companies recognize that the high-risk growth market should be more stringent than the main board regulatory measures. However, many companies believe that if they are calculated at a ratio of 80%, they can actually say that their fund-raising projects are basically free of risks. According to this standard, it seems that indirect financing can be achieved without reflecting the superiority of the GEM.
Intermediary may still be the bottleneck
It is understood that most companies believe that the GEM's financial requirements for the company are more reasonable, and its continuous profitability, the cumulative net profit of more than 10 million yuan and other two sets of standards threshold is actually relatively low. According to Zhang Wei, deputy director of the Capital Markets Division of the Shandong Provincial Development and Reform Commission, according to the published threshold criteria, Shandong's eight high-tech parks are still quite listed resources. However, for the three-year period of the company's requirements, some of the companies that had hoped for the GEM to break through in this area will be short-listed. Gao Dezong, president of Qingdao Liangyou Catering Co., Ltd., said: “Our company is developing very fast and the company has been established for less than 3 years, but the financial indicators and other indicators far exceed the threshold for the establishment of the GEM. We would have liked the GEM to relax in this regard. Now, we'll still be better on small and medium boards after we've been full for 3 years."
Hao Zhibo, deputy manager of Shandong Chu Group, said that simply lowering the threshold of the GEM did not completely solve the problem. Last year, the group had a subsidiary company that was operating overseas and listed on GEM after communicating with Shandong Securities Regulatory Bureau. However, Hao Zhibo said that the unique sponsor system stipulated on the market has clearly become a bottleneck in the current corporate upsurge. There are fewer sponsors and more projects, so that the sponsors can pick and thin the project. In particular, in terms of listing fees, the ED reduced some of the disclosure fees, such as disclosure fees, but the total amount of Financing Financing was low. Proportional conversion of sponsorship fees was low, and intermediaries considered marginal benefits. Many companies find it difficult to find suitable sponsors. . Even if there is no limit on the number of items recommended by the sponsor, there are still problems with the quality of counseling. Therefore, the development of a multi-tiered capital market should take into account the overall coordination of a set of institutional arrangements and promote the whole.