The first domestic air quality standard in the country, “Guide to the Air Quality Assessment for Passenger Vehicles,” has been in place since March 1 last year. The "Guide" clearly specifies the limits of 8 kinds of common VOC concentrations in the air in the car related to benzene and formaldehyde. Not only for new cars, but also for cars in use. The industry’s insiders once optimistically predicted that the “Guide” fills the gap in the air quality standards in China’s interior, which will eventually allow standards for in-vehicle air testing. This will encourage manufacturers to pay attention to the quality of air in the vehicle and greatly increase the air quality in passenger cars. quality.

However, it was counterproductive. Although the air test has standards, but because the "Guide" is not a mandatory standard promulgated by the state, it is only a recommended national standard and has no legal effect. Therefore, the implementation of one year has had little success. For example, in September 2012, six months after the implementation of the “Guide”, 300 car owners collectively complained about a 4 times excess of formaldehyde in a certain brand of car, and eventually lost their news. Also in September, a "healthy car inspection report" showed that 11 mainstream models may have carcinogenic risk and eventually become bad news.

For auto companies, because the Guide is a recommended national standard, it can be implemented or not. What's more, if we want to improve the air quality inside the car, we must upgrade the technology, which will inevitably increase the cost. However, even if enterprises increase the cost and improve the air quality inside the car, they will not receive any subsidy policy; if the company continues to ignore the bad car air quality, it will not have to worry about fines, but the increased costs will be reduced. Product competitiveness and profit. So in this case, how many companies can actively improve the air quality in the car? The enthusiasm is naturally not high.

For consumers, because the Guide is a recommended national standard, rather than enforced, it cannot be used as the basis for rights claims. "Guide" as a recommended standard, is to allow owners to purchase a car, if you have objections to the quality of the air, you can put forward a test, if the test is not up to the standard, the owner may not buy the car. However, because the car is not up to the standard, the owner will claim compensation according to the standard after purchase. It is also because of the non-mandatory implementation of the "Guideline" that there is no relevant penalties. Consumer claims also lack specific compensation standards.

At present, with the increasingly harsh environment, people are paying more and more attention to air quality. Some people in the industry say that consumers have suffered too much in the case of continuous haze. If the air quality in the car is still not regulated by the law, it will be a sorrow for the entire Chinese automobile industry, so it is important to improve the air pollution in the car. In fact, to put it plainly, improving the quality of air in the car cannot be done by car companies. There is only one driving force for all manufacturers to actively improve the air quality in the car. That is to increase the “guideline” to national mandatory standards, improve relevant laws and regulations, and establish and improve national environmental and health policies and regulations that focus on prevention.

Only by improving the air pollution in the car, can the implementation of the Guidelines be on the track of the rule of law, in order to encourage auto manufacturers to upgrade the use of materials for passenger cars to legal standards, and to enable consumers to Really have the right to know about air pollution in the car. With more awareness of health and environmental protection, the car environment will also have more protection.