How to fight the "price" war of land circulation?

According to the 2016 “National Provincial Land Transfer Market Price Rankings”, the average price of land transfer in Jiangxi, Hunan, Anhui, Xinjiang, Liaoning and other regions is ranging from 300 to 600 yuan/mu/year, 600~1000 yuan/ In the mu/year interval, there are Chongqing, Zhejiang, Shandong, Guangdong, Henan and other places, while Beijing, Shanghai, Hainan, Tianjin, Shaanxi, Shanxi and other places have higher circulation prices, mostly in the range of 1000~3000 yuan/mu/year. Inside, and in Shanghai, 3240 yuan / mu / year high.

There are many reasons for the large difference in the price of circulation around the country: first, the market factor, China's rural land transfer market has not yet formed a standardized price system, and the third-party land valuation platform has yet to be developed, which makes it difficult to achieve professionalism in the circulation price. Fairness; secondly, location factors. Under normal circumstances, location conditions and land prices are positively correlated; in addition, circulation methods and scale factors, China currently mostly transfers land in the form of sublease and subcontracting. Generally, the larger the circulation After the transfer, the better the economic benefit prospects of the project, the higher the circulation price; the natural conditions such as traffic conditions, water source conditions and cultivated land quality.

In order to avoid more farmers encountering the problem of land price “price trap”, in recent years, such as Jiangsu Nanjing, Zhejiang Taizhou, Jiangxi Nanchang and other places began to try to introduce land transfer prices by the government. For example, the Nanjing Municipal Government not only limits the low price of circulation, but also stipulates that in principle, the turnover period exceeds 3 years, and the increase in the price of land management rights must be determined.

The government guidance price can not only protect the legitimate rights and interests of the transferred people, but also regulate the circulation market and form a benign competition pattern. However, there are still a few areas where the government has introduced the price of the government. In the case of land transfer, it is reasonable to determine the rent of one mu of land, and there is still lack of professional market data and valuation system support. In this case, There are still some difficulties in getting a specific program with strong operability.

Therefore, in order to improve the land transfer price mechanism, in addition to the role of the government, it must also play a good role in the market. For example, the establishment of a market-oriented flow information platform will make the information on transactions, transaction prices, and transaction entities in the land transfer open and transparent; and encourage the development of third-party land agencies, in accordance with the classification guidance, scientific calculation, realistic comparison and increasing amplitude. The combined requirements guide the two parties in the form of negotiated pricing, bidding pricing, bidding pricing, etc., reasonably determine the rural land transfer price, and strengthen the fairness of the transaction.

At present, the large-scale Internet land transfer integrated service platform in China is exploring and developing and gradually improving the automatic valuation system of agricultural land, and using the power of big data on the Internet to provide a more scientific and reliable basis for improving the land transfer price mechanism.

(Original title: How does the land transfer jump out of the "price trap"?)